Saturday, March 02, 2013

The awakening


Thirty years after Indira Gandhi gave NABARD, P Chidambaram promises to give financial wings to the women to fly to their real freedom. The “all women” bank is much more than what it’s being taken for by a large number of people. It's about means to becoming part of society in true sense, which otherwise is handicapped, standing on one leg, with other being crippled. 


Society stands on two legs. Men and women constitute the two legs. A nation is made of societies. India story except for the last one decade has been that of a nation running on one leg. The other leg is sluggish and laggard for being not put to use for centuries. In a sense, India had been marching ahead with a self-imposed disability.

Finance Minister P Chidambaram has taken two distinct steps to bring the “other leg” to its full vigour. First is an all women bank and secondly a Rs 1,000 crore fund of women safety. Together they address key concerns of women – financial exclusion and lack of security. In the absence of financial inclusion and a sense of security, hoping women to enjoy their freedom is a mere day-dreaming.

Not only India, a host of countries, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Arab world, whole of Africa, claim to firmly stand on their feet; but with one leg largely crippled and paralyzed. Consequently, they all present a picture of refusing to wake up from their medieval age slumber.

Bangladesh is a case in contrast. The youngest nation led by two powerful women alternatively has been able to open large windows of awakening and development. While the Shahbag movement is ruling full steam, there is a clear sense that the youth there is hitting the Jihadi wall quite hard. The day the wall is brought down the region will surely breathe a new air of moderation and reason. If that happens, we shall reserve our congratulations for the powerful woman Prime Minister of Bangladesh – Sheikh Hasina.

Women can bring around revolution. There had been a number of revolutions, which were in nature of nations caught in implosion. But the one brought about by women invariably take the nations forward.

India’s Late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi too had seeded revolution for food security through green revolution. A revolution needs fuels of all kinds – human resources, technological breakthroughs and interventions, financial outreach, etc.

Thirty years back Gandhi gave India NABARD (National Bank for agriculture and rural development). This intervention triggered India’s robust agricultural march. Now India’s agriculture not only feeds more than a billion mouths but earns foreign exchange through export of foodgrains.

Another thirty years later since Gandhi’s deeds, Chidambaram promises to give financial wings to the women to fly to their real freedom. The “all women” bank is much more than what it’s being taken for by a large number of people.

However, Chidambaram’s measure has come a little late. Three years ago, the government had launched the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM) as Aajivika. The programme was based on setting up of a financial institution, with a corpus of over Rs 9,000 crores, to give support after support to women self help groups (SHGs). This, however, did not materialize. Predictably, the Aajivika too did not take off in the true sense.


But the Finance Minister has made some amends. The proposal to set up India’s first ever state owned bank by the women and for the women, with an initial support of Rs 1,000 crore, could just give a fresh lease of life to Aajivika.

The proposed “women all” bank is supposed to lend mostly to women and women-run businesses, which supports women SHGs and women's livelihood, that employs predominantly women, and that addresses gender related aspects of empowerment and financial inclusion.

The financial weakness has seen the women led SHG movement largely confined to four southern states -- Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnatka. These states largely benefit from the Central government’s annual funds for NRLM (RS 39,000 crore for 2012-13 but actually spent Rs 26,000 crore).

In the absence of financial support and lack of collateral to claim loans for the livelihoods activities, women in North and eastern parts of India have hardly gained from the government scheme for livelihoods mission (Aajivika).


Currently, India has about 25 lakh SHGs headed by women. They in all engage three crore women. The government is targeting to expand the SHGs from the current 25 lakh to 60 lakh in five years. The government hopes that seven crore women would engage in SHGs in five year’s time. So, the government is actually looking ahead to just double the strength and participation.


It’s here the proposed “all women” bank fits in the picture of India attempting to empower women. Such a bank nonetheless is neither novel nor first. The Pandiyan bank was the first “all women” bank launched in 1947 but later merged with Canara bank.

Thus, such a bank may over a period of time have the potential to transform Indian society and the nation too. It’s worth noting the contribution of women in heralding stability to Indian polity. The stable governments of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Chhatisgarh, Gujrat, Tripura, Delhi, owe a lot to women, who vote in a large numbers outnumbering their male counterparts.

So, the story may just be unfolding. 

3 comments:

Thufail PT said...

Though a novel idea, the all-women bank announced by Finance Minister P Chidambaram in his budget speech in parliament lacks clarity and certainty. It is a fact that women in the country need special attention in banking facilities. However, one becomes skeptic as to how a mere promise to provide them with “women-only banks” would help them. The government is still unable to ensure access to banking facilities to the people in the rural India with the already existing banks including the nationalized banks. Even the recently launched (in two versions) Banking Correspondent model has proved a failure. In that case, the government should make it clear how is it going to set up these new banks. How will it ensure that the new banks will reach the women in this country? Also, one is not convinced about the new opportunities that it will open to the women in this country? When you also consider the fact that there is no attempt to give any reduction in interest rates for loans to the SHGs, it is more than obvious that the announcement is nothing but mere tokenism. It is trying to use the post-Delhi-gang rape political scenario in the country. It is so evident when the government chose to name the women’s fund after the pseudonym given to the gang rape victim by a particular English newspaper. Why didn’t the government name it after the pseudonym given by Hindi newspapers and channels (Dhamini) is more revealing about who actually fall under the government’s target group? My answer is the so called “New Middle Class” as discovered in the Congress’s recent Chintan Shibir.

Mukesh Ranjan said...

Banking is not act of gender discrimination. It just a misplaced argument to say that all women bank will provide financial stability to a women. The problem now a days the country is facing is that solution for the recent spurt in violence against women, which is aghast and deplorable to no end, is being sought through exclusion of women from the main stream by making everything separate for them. By doing this the power enter in the country headed by a woman is trying to destroy the beauty, which the God has ordained on the humanity. Exclusion is no solution, inclusion is solution and we all should try to achieve this in our day to day behaviour, all atrocity will evaporate like Kapur...

Amol Mishra said...

THE CONCEPT OF OPENING A BANK EXCLUSIVELY FOR WOMEN IS JUST A POLITICAL GIMMICK.IT IS A TIME CONSUMING PROCESS i.e DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE,A MAMMOTH CAPITAL,SKILLED TEAM OF WOMEN,EXPERTIES ETC.IT IS TRUE THAT WOMEN REQUIRE SOCIAL SECURITY AND FINANCIAL STABILITY.FOR THAT THERE ARE MANY PROVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUTION.THE MAIN THING IS THE IMPLEMENTION IN TRUE SENSE.MY OPINION IS THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER IF THERE WOULD BE A SPECIAL COUNTER EXCLUSIVELY FOR WOMEN IN THE EXISTING BANKING SYSTEM.THIS STEP WOULD LESSEN THE TIME ,CAPITAL AND OTHER COMPLEXITIES.MR CHIDEMBER HAS NOT APPLIED A CLEVER ATTITUDE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF WOMEN.THE OPA HAS CHEATED THEM.MY INVESTIGATION SAYS THAT THE O P A HAS TAKEN THE REVENGE FROM WOMEN BECAUSE WOMEN TOOK PART IN THE RECENT CRUSADE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT.