Thirty years after Indira Gandhi gave NABARD, P Chidambaram promises to give financial wings to the women to fly to their real freedom. The “all women” bank is much more than what it’s being taken for by a large number of people. It's about means to becoming part of society in true sense, which otherwise is handicapped, standing on one leg, with other being crippled.
Society stands on two legs. Men and women
constitute the two legs. A nation is made of societies. Ind ia
story except for the last one decade has been that of a nation running on one
leg. The other leg is sluggish and laggard for being not put to use for centuries.
In a sense, Ind ia had been
marching ahead with a self-imposed disability.
Finance Minister P Chidambaram has taken two
distinct steps to bring the “other leg” to its full vigo ur. First is an all women bank and
secondly a Rs 1,000 crore fund of women safety. Together they address key
concerns of women – financial exclusion and lack of security. In the absence of
financial inclusion and a sense of security, hoping women to enjoy their
freedom is a mere day-dreaming.
Not only Ind ia , a host of countries,
including Pakistan , Afghanistan , Arab world, whole of Africa , claim to firmly stand on their feet; but with one
leg largely crippled and paralyzed. Consequently, they all present a picture of
refusing to wake up from their medieval age slumber.
Women can bring around revolution. There had
been a number of revolutions, which were in nature of nations caught in
implosion. But the one brought about by women invariably take the nations
forward.
Thirty years back Gandhi gave Ind ia
NABARD (National Bank for agriculture and rural development). This intervention
triggered Ind ia ’s
robust agricultural march. Now Ind ia ’s agriculture
not only feeds more than a billion mouths but earns foreign exchange through
export of foodgrains.
Another thirty years later since Gandhi’s
deeds, Chidambaram promises to give financial wings to the women to fly to their real freedom. The “all women” bank is much more than what it’s being
taken for by a large number of people.
However, Chidambaram’s measure has come a
little late. Three years ago, the government had launched the National Rural Livelihoods
Mission (NRLM) as Aajivika. The programme was based on setting up of a
financial institution, with a corpus of over Rs 9,000 crores, to give support after
support to women self help groups (SHGs). This, however, did not materialize. Predictably,
the Aajivika too did not take off in the true sense.
But the Finance Minister has made some amends.
The proposal to set up India ’s
first ever state owned bank by the women and for the women, with an initial
support of Rs 1,000 crore, could just give a fresh lease of life to Aajivika.
The proposed “women all” bank is supposed to
lend mostly to women and women-run businesses, which supports women SHGs and women's
livelihood, that employs predominantly women, and that addresses gender related
aspects of empowerment and financial inclusion.
The financial weakness has seen the women led
SHG movement largely confined to four southern states -- Andhra Pradesh, Tamil
Nadu, Kerala and Karnatka. These states largely benefit from the Central
government’s annual funds for NRLM (RS 39,000 crore for 2012-13 but actually
spent Rs 26,000 crore).
In the absence of financial support and lack of
collateral to claim loans for the livelihoods activities, women in North and
eastern parts of India
have hardly gained from the government scheme for livelihoods mission (Aajivika).
Currently, India has about 25 lakh SHGs headed
by women. They in all engage three crore women. The government is targeting to
expand the SHGs from the current 25 lakh to 60 lakh in five years. The
government hopes that seven crore women would engage in SHGs in five year’s
time. So, the government is actually looking ahead to just double the strength and participation.
It’s here the proposed “all women” bank fits in
the picture of Ind ia attempting to
empower women. Such a bank nonetheless is neither novel nor first. The Pandiyan
bank was the first “all women” bank launched in 1947 but later merged with Cana ra bank.
Thus, such a bank may over a period of time have
the potential to transform Ind ia n society and the
nation too. It’s worth noting the contribution of women in heralding stability
to Ind ia n
polity. The stable governments of Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Chhatisgarh, Gujrat, Tripura , Del hi , owe a lot to women, who
vote in a large numbers outnumbering their male counterparts.
So, the story may just be unfolding.
3 comments:
Though a novel idea, the all-women bank announced by Finance Minister P Chidambaram in his budget speech in parliament lacks clarity and certainty. It is a fact that women in the country need special attention in banking facilities. However, one becomes skeptic as to how a mere promise to provide them with “women-only banks” would help them. The government is still unable to ensure access to banking facilities to the people in the rural India with the already existing banks including the nationalized banks. Even the recently launched (in two versions) Banking Correspondent model has proved a failure. In that case, the government should make it clear how is it going to set up these new banks. How will it ensure that the new banks will reach the women in this country? Also, one is not convinced about the new opportunities that it will open to the women in this country? When you also consider the fact that there is no attempt to give any reduction in interest rates for loans to the SHGs, it is more than obvious that the announcement is nothing but mere tokenism. It is trying to use the post-Delhi-gang rape political scenario in the country. It is so evident when the government chose to name the women’s fund after the pseudonym given to the gang rape victim by a particular English newspaper. Why didn’t the government name it after the pseudonym given by Hindi newspapers and channels (Dhamini) is more revealing about who actually fall under the government’s target group? My answer is the so called “New Middle Class” as discovered in the Congress’s recent Chintan Shibir.
Banking is not act of gender discrimination. It just a misplaced argument to say that all women bank will provide financial stability to a women. The problem now a days the country is facing is that solution for the recent spurt in violence against women, which is aghast and deplorable to no end, is being sought through exclusion of women from the main stream by making everything separate for them. By doing this the power enter in the country headed by a woman is trying to destroy the beauty, which the God has ordained on the humanity. Exclusion is no solution, inclusion is solution and we all should try to achieve this in our day to day behaviour, all atrocity will evaporate like Kapur...
THE CONCEPT OF OPENING A BANK EXCLUSIVELY FOR WOMEN IS JUST A POLITICAL GIMMICK.IT IS A TIME CONSUMING PROCESS i.e DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE,A MAMMOTH CAPITAL,SKILLED TEAM OF WOMEN,EXPERTIES ETC.IT IS TRUE THAT WOMEN REQUIRE SOCIAL SECURITY AND FINANCIAL STABILITY.FOR THAT THERE ARE MANY PROVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUTION.THE MAIN THING IS THE IMPLEMENTION IN TRUE SENSE.MY OPINION IS THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER IF THERE WOULD BE A SPECIAL COUNTER EXCLUSIVELY FOR WOMEN IN THE EXISTING BANKING SYSTEM.THIS STEP WOULD LESSEN THE TIME ,CAPITAL AND OTHER COMPLEXITIES.MR CHIDEMBER HAS NOT APPLIED A CLEVER ATTITUDE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF WOMEN.THE OPA HAS CHEATED THEM.MY INVESTIGATION SAYS THAT THE O P A HAS TAKEN THE REVENGE FROM WOMEN BECAUSE WOMEN TOOK PART IN THE RECENT CRUSADE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT.
Post a Comment