Assertive Manmohan Singh?

A write up on a new book "Ayodhya: Battle For Peace" by Nirendra Dev. (Mr Dev happens to be a very good friend of this blogger and appreciates his keen interest in India's socio-political moores )

There is an apparent gap between the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the UPA chairperson Sonia andhi of late. Dr Singh is apparently struggling hard to come clean on the 2G\spectrum scam. His offer to appear before the PAC headed by BJP leader M. M. Joshi also appears to have been taken without taking the Congress leadership into confidence. A confirmation to this came from none other than the Congress' poster boy Pranab Mukherjee who on Sunday stated in Kolkata that had he been consulted he would have advised Dr Sigh against such a move. To put in the perspective, if Dr Singh belives that the mandate in the 2008 elections was for him, then he is not wrong. The Congress got a boost because of his image. But his personal record is at stake now as one of his ministerial collegaue, A Raja of the DMK, an alliance partner of the UPA, allegedly masterminded mother of all scam in the history of India, which Congress, sadly, is attempting to brush under the carpet. There is a palpable unrest within the Congress, as the leaders reading the Bihar verdict know that the party is headed for electoral disaster in the next elections.

Nirendra Dev in his new book "Ayodhya: Battle For Peace" by Nirendra Dev" reveals that the "gap" between the 7, RCR and 10, Janpath began just after the Lok Sabha elections in 2008. The book states that even Dr Singh reject Sonia's nominee as Lok Sabha Speaker. Mr Deb writes that Dr Singh into his second term is getting more assertive and "persuasive in pushing his personal preferences".

"Grapevine is a senior parliamentarian was denied the Lok Sabha Speaker’s post in 2009 even after his name was cleared formally by UPA alliance in a joint sitting," says ‘Ayodhya: Battle For Peace’.  "If the conjectures are to be believed, NCP chief Sharad Pawar, Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee and even top Congress leaders had reportedly complimented the said member for being chosen for the coveted office in June 2009; when Dr Singh threw in the Dalit-woman card to elevate his ‘Water Resources Minister’ Meira Kumar for the key job," says the book. , a publication of New Delhi-based Har-Anand Publication.

"Slowly but certainly, minor scuffle has started between Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh and the party – even if not Congress president Sonia Gandhi herself. She is still considered too powerful for ‘non-political’ character like Dr Singh, though his admirers and adversaries feel slowly the ‘underestimated’ politician in him is showing some glimpses of verb." It further says, Dr Singh’s admirers are reported to have floated the theory that the 2009 mandate for UPA was in effect a mandate for him. His media advisor has already

spoken against Congress in a public function; and yet continues to enjoy the Prime Minister’s confidence."

Amid high drama in national polity over scams and alleged 'Hindu terror' under RSS, the book also cautions Congress against going overboard on ‘Hindu terror’ saying in the process Congress is only preparing the ground "for political polarization (based on religions)" "The Hindus in general are anguished as well as shell-shocked at the allegation that their faith, known for its tolerance, is being linked to terrorism. They believe the Congress party led by a Christian and that too a foreign lady is indulging in politics to defame the Hindu

organizations and thus win over its lost support base among the Muslims. There was a deliberate attempt to blow up the issue of ‘Hindu terror’ just on the eve of beginning of monsoon session of parliament in 2010," writes Dev, who had started his career in journalism from Nagaland in 1990s.

He argues the Congress attempts have failed as the opposition parties including the traditionally diametrically opposite planks the BJP and the Left had "remained united on price rise and the corruption". The government of the day would do well to realize that it is only playing a dangerous game, it says.

Dev, who has also authored a book on Gujarat riots of 2002, ‘Godhra –A Journey To Mayhem’ and 'The Talking Guns: North East India', claims that the perceived Muslim appeasement of the Congress party and the secular brigade "without working genuinely for Muslims uplift is only bound to increase hate-Muslims approach among Hindus".

From the government of the day in centre led by Dr Manmohan Singh and other parties like Samajwadi Party and even Trinamool Congress from Left-ruled Bengal all are only indulging in vote bank policies – "at

least the people, a large section of Hindus, think so", the book says Even in the past, the Muslims fell into a political trap of appeasement by secularists and communists from quite beginning. Indira Gandhi’s secular agenda only sought to pamper the Muslims and slowlythe political division only engulfed, it says.

"The Muslims should learn to live in harmony as the confrontationist path does them no good," it says adding

the intellectuals and the upwardly mobile Muslims have failed to educate their common masses and the vibrant community "has been reduced to a mere political tool for garnering votes".

On communal tension in South Asia

The rise of Hindutva communalism in 1992 with the Babri Masjid demolition had its "worst ever" affect in Bangladesh and Pakistan with helpless Hindus getting victimized, says a new book in India even as it claims that fundamentalism would bury its ugly head soon in South Asia.

"The communal problem and violence in one country often triggers a chain reaction in other countries. Therefore, it made a lot of sense when Bangladeshi documentary film maker Shameem Akhtar said a few years back, the rise of fundamentalism in many South Asian countries is simultaneous," says ‘Ayodhya: Battle for Peace’, first book in India on the post September 30, 2010 verdict on the protracted temple-mosque dispute.

"The overall future cannot be very good for the communal forces in South Asia" and cites the illustration of the return of Sheikh Hasina regime in Bangladesh in 2008 as a glaring instance, it says.

"The manner in which people responded to the September 30 (2010) ruling on Ayodhya verdict offers enough reasons to keep the secular disposition optimistic that the days of fundamentalism are numbered for the common man has had enough of it and long since rejected the same," writes journalist Nirendra Dev, who had also authored a book on Gujarat riots of 2002 titled, ‘Godhra – A Journey To Mayhem’.

Even in Pakistan, take a closer scrutiny and one would find that in "a country created in the name of religion, people have refused to play for long in the hands of religious fanaticism", says the book adding firstly, Bengali Muslims decided to carve out an independent nation for them. Muslims in the then East Pakistan proved that they had tremendous pride in past achievements and distinct linguistic and cultural identity. "The religion, the only link between the people of two Pakistans, was thus easily broken and on March 27, 1971, Sheikh Mujibar Rehman proclaimed the creation of an independent nation."

Maintaining that communalism has a lot to do with power politics, the book points out how the Vajpayee government in India had turned "a blind eye" to continuous attack on Christians and later to the 2002 infamous Gujarat carnage.

"In Pakistan, the Late Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was once known for his liberal approach. A staunch opponent of Ayub Khan’s fanaticism, in 1970 election campaign in Rawalpindi Bhutto galloped Scotch whisky publicly to decry the ban on drinking. But the same Bhutto after attaining power took up anti-India stance, emulated fanatic mullah practices and declared Friday as weekly holiday instead of Sunday.

The same yardstick would apply to Nawaz Shariff, who was given a massive mandate in 1996 for promise to improve relations with India, gradually started swearing by India bashing phrases. He resorted to Islamisation of the country following the collapse of Pakistani economy after the nuke tests at Chagai in 1998 and allowed Kargil misadventure on the face of sustained pressure from military-mullah combine."