History has keys to many riddles of modern times.
But history bores most, as it has mostly been written by red-clothed men, who owe their intellectual sharpness to propaganda publications shipped from Russia and dumped in various varsities of India.
Most haunting riddle of contemporary India is its over 16 per cent population holding on to the belief that their "religion is in danger". This danger seems perennial.
And as curtain comes down in another one week over long drawn out election campaign to elect members of the 16th Lok Sabha, there is no denying the fact that Muslims have been used as canon fireballs against BJP's PM candidate Narendra Modi. Nonetheless, a tiny lot among the Muslims have bolted and become Modi supporter; but they are too few to matter at all.
Muslim boys playing cricket in Bhagalpur (Bihar) |
The Likes of Mamata Banerjee, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Mayawati, Rahul Gandhi and his mother Sonia Gandhi among others have tried their best to make Muslims believe that Modi would "butcher" them if he were to come to power in New Delhi. That the seemingly "massacres of Muslims will be all around" campaign slogan of non-BJP political parties surely seeks to milk "religion in danger" psyche of the minority community.
Long into the past, it was a local battle fought and lost by Muslim Nawab of Bengal , Siraj-ud-Daulla, on June 23, 1757 at Plassey, that seeded, arguably, for the first time, "religion in danger" psyche in Muslim minds. Incidentally, Mamata Banerjee finds Mir Jafar literally on her tongue if she has to bash any political dissidence within his Trinamool Congress.
One hundred and sixty two years later, "religion in danger" was institutionalized in Indian political discourse. And, it was none other than Mohan Das Karam Chand Gandhi, later Mahatma Gandhi, after he became an icon of India's freedom struggle, who made it happen.
In his eagerness to win over Muslims to freedom struggle movement at a time when Sir Sayyed Ahmed had indoctrinated minority community to become pro-British to help them get government jobs, Gandhi gambled to mix religion and politics to spearhead Khilafat movement (1919-1924) for a cause, which had nothing to do with India and even Turkish Muslims thought otherwise.
The movement flopped and Gandhi proved himself to be a political novice. Even though the red-clothed historians would see only virtue in that failed experiment, India paid heavy price in just 23 years time, as Britain ran its surgical knife to dismember the country. What the Greats like Ashoka, Chandragupta Mourya and Akbar had passed on as legacy was squandered off by the deeds and misdeeds of awfully slow freedom movement of India and incompetence of those leading it.
Ironically, Gandhi may not have seen far into the future to know that a few years later Pakistani Army and numerous militant organizations groomed by Rawalpindi would wreak havoc with their "religion in danger" weapon by allowing and executing massacres of people on a scale never seen in the world history. Gandhi may have just lit a flame, but Muhammed Ali Jinnah first and Gen. Zial-ul-Haque later turned that into a raging fire.
Jinnah with Gandhi |
It's important to slip into history for a while, because contemporary politicians seem an ignorant lot. By keeping alive apprehensions of riots, Muslims in India have been herded, first by Jinnah and later by all and sundry. In the 2014 Lok Sabha election campaign, it has been made like that Narendra Modi is a "rioter par excellence".
A year back, journalist and playwright, Tehseen Munawer, wrote an open letter to Uttar Pradesh chief minister, Akhilesh Yadav, asking if he could take his kids to his ancestral village on Eid. That he had to write the letter had to do with over 50 communal riots having taken place in Central and eastern UP by them. But that was much before the ever peaceful western UP where Jats and Muslims shared quite symbiotic relations too became hunting ground for blood thirsty men.
And with so many riots in the past two years under the watch of a "secular" government in Lucknow, mood of Muslims was worthwhile to explore. So, off the Agra-Firozabad highway, Haji Jallo Aloowaale, 75., had a lot to share.
He claimed that he had been voting for Mulayam Singh Yadav (SP) since 1984. "Mulayam ko vote karna Allah ki marzi hai (it's Allah's will that we vote for Mulayam)," said Haji Jallo. But the same Mulayam allowed quite a few riots to take place in UP, did not he? To this he said: "Mulayam ne Masjid girne nahi dee (Mulyam ensured that the mosque was not demolished)," said Jallo.
Haji Jallo |
When asked about who will the Muslims here vote for, Jallo stopped a few young people, including burqa clad women, and demanded to know, whom they would vote for. With one hand resting on the waist and a young burqa clad woman for the company, a young man said "BSP". "Get out, you scoundrels," screamed Jallo, and the young men and women made a hasty retreat, with glare in their eyes.
With contradictions on display, it was prudent to check with others and Ajgar Hussain Quraisi, 45, seemed quite eager to talk. "We will vote for Mulayam, but young Muslims seem tilting toward BSP. The older generation among Muslims are sticking with Mulayam," said Quraisi.
When Modi's name is dropped, it becomes quite evident that Muslims are extra careful this elections not to allow the BJP run away with most number of seats in UP. "Gardan kata sakte haen par Modi ko vote nahi de sakte (We can lose our lives, but can't vote for Modi," said Muhammed Momeen in Agra.
There are also a few Muslims who are opting for BSP, because of their unhappiness with the Samajwadi Party government in Lucknow. "We do not get any benefits: no jobs under MGNREGA, no elderly pension, no health care. We will vote for BSP in this elections," said Dilawar Khan, 35, in Konchhi village in Mainpuri (UP).
Dilawar Khan in Mainpuri (UP) |
A few conversations here and there gave a clear picture that the Muslims are identifying strong candidates against BJP across UP. "In Agra, we will vote for BSP; but in Firozabad our votes will go for SP," said Akbar Khan, 40. In Mathura, Muhammed Saleem, 45, said that Muslims would largely be voting for RLD (Jayant Choudhary against Hema Malini).
Incidentally, UP, Bihar, West Bengal and Assam are states where "religion in danger" plank has helped political parties to herd Muslims for many decades. Shahid Siddiqui, a former member of Rajya Sabha and editor of Urdu weekly Nai Duniya, came openly in favour of Modi, and argues against "herd" behaviour of Muslims in elections.
"My timeline on Twitter is flooded with abuses, but I don't care. If Muslims want to progress, they will have to come out of this herd mindset. If they start voting for the BJP, cadre of the party will also accordingly change their beliefs and outlook about Muslims," said Siddiqui.
Ram Sewak Yadav, 55, a keen political observer in Etah (UP), noted that Muslims are in a position to stop BJP in at least 40 Lok Sabha seats. But, he adds, a sharper polarization of non-Muslims and non-Yadavs in favour of the BJP would nullify all tactical advantage that the minority community had been enjoying in previous elections. And that appears to have happened in UP and also taking place in Bihar and Assam, with a beginning in West Bengal as well.
Clearly, Muslims, egged on by a host of political parties, appear to be on front-line of the cross-fire against Modi. And, that suits Modi well, as is noted by Nirendra Dev, whose book "Modi to Moditva: An uncensored truth" was first to hit the stand among a few more . "After the post-Godhra riots, Modi during campaign for Assembly elections told me that the more he was bashed being anti-Muslims the more he got stronger; and he does not feel the need to counter that image as projected by his rivals," Dev notes.
India surely awaits Muslims to bolt. It's animals who herd, not humans. And two hundred and fifty seven years are awfully long time to take a leap of faith.
10 comments:
It is definitely a case that vote bank politics has harmed India. So much of Muslim appeasement that it misguided muslims...in bengal, assam and Kerala..where locals have their own language and respectively proud of it ........started talking in favour of Urdu language....such methodology has harmed muslims more
It is definitely a case that vote bank politics has harmed India. So much of Muslim appeasement that it misguided muslims...in bengal, assam and Kerala..where locals have their own language and respectively proud of it ........started talking in favour of Urdu language....such methodology has harmed muslims more
You have missed the fact about how a big section of even the majority is now crying about the threat to 'Hindutva', something that was created by the RSS.
The Ayodhya temple issue has exploited Hindus no less than the exploitation of Muslims in the past.
Sadhana: Thanks for taking time out to read the post. I recall Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, chairman of vision document for minorities, having told me, that "so much poison has been administered to Muslims for so many years, that I am convinced none of them will vote for the BJP. But, he added, the BJP seeks their social and economic progress. Also, we can not fault much the Muslims, because they have been biggest victim of ghetto-politics. They will take their own time to come out of ghetto.
Anil: If we pip a little into India's political history, we will find that it was late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi on the eve of the 1989 Lok Sabha elections, unlocked the door of Babri mosque where the idol of Ram Lulla was kept. The BJP came on the issue later. Furthermore, building a Ram temple is still part of BJP's manifesto. But the matter is pending before the Supreme Court. And, additionally, efforts at multiple levels are underway to find an out of the court settlement. We can surely give some time to such a vexed issue. I suggest you must go once to Ayodhya to understand the subject much better.
Muslims are actually exploited by the people for whom they generally vote.But what else we can do when they themselves don't want to improve their condition.I don't know what Islam has actually taught them....Why don't they understand that the prosperity of a nation will be shared by everyone?
@ Author= Sorry as I have deleted my comment from its original position cause I have found few mistakes in that...It was slip of pen..hope u didn't mind it.But I am again posting cause I want to give my answer to Mr.Anil.
@ Mr. Anil = With due respect I would say that whatever you have said is absolutely right.I was in hurry so didn't write about that aspect.Why this Ram Mandir is still there in the manifesto of BJP ? When it doesn't make any sense in this 21st century..Even I used to ask people that why this whole world is so obsessed with religion..be it Islam,Christianity,Hindu etc etc.Which holy book has ever taught about supremacy of one religion over other?Cause at the end of the day its we who allow these politicians to exploit us.
Post a Comment